Asrock FM2A58M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 10:13
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 141
61% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 222
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D + R7 200 Dual Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 9.92
Parallax 10.1
6% 9.27 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 7.96
6% 7.61 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 83 70 82 90 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 94
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 80.8
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-HD+ Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback