Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH532

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK LH532  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB1F
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120524
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 24 '16 at 13:24
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 382
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2626
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 2.81
3% 3.78 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.52
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 391
Mixed 401
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 28.8
112% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 116
143% 252 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 04CB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK LH532 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH532

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback