HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro 3130 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110318
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 20:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 39
2-Core 47.1
32% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 98.1
8-Core 116
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 2A9C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.81
Parallax 0.88
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 55 47 55 82 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 88.2
Write 112
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 61.9
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1333D364L9/4G000 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.5
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3130 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback