Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Partech EverServ 7200B-30

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Partech EverServ 7200B-30 (all builds)
Motherboard	ParTech Everserv 7000
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '16 at 19:58
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D2550 408 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 53.3 1-Core 8 2-Core 13.8 21% 25 Pts	4-Core 22.8 8-Core 25.6 3% 24.2 Pts	64-Core 26.5 2% 26.5 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1313 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 14 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 301 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 9854 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 167505035297 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 195 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 179 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	52.2% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 91.7 Mixed 32.2 52% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.21 65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 57%
Patriot Memory 16GB 454 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 10GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.65% Terrible	Read 33 Write 7.22 Mixed 10.1 16% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.11 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 21% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.65% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H 1x4GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback