Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 07:25
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$354
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
SC Int 144
SC Float 153
SC Mixed 147
118% 148 Pts
QC Int 561
QC Float 591
QC Mixed 525
127% 559 Pts
MC Int 707
MC Float 835
MC Mixed 782
116% 775 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$674
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 498
Reflection 455
Parallax 484
152% 479 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 587
Splatting 306
174% 390 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 165%
Great: 175%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$199
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 309 338 370 331 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 471
Mixed 388
SusWrite 335
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 44.2
164% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
257% 343 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$90
42GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 95 94 95 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 81.2
Mixed 50
SusWrite 92.8
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
15GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 41
Write 41.7
Mixed 35
SusWrite 41.3
54% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
46GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 41
Write 42.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 42.3
51% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
5GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 26 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 27
Write 37
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 30.7
42% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
9GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 53 54 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 72.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 43
SusWrite 53.2
80% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 20.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 14,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $592

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,646
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $674Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $606SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback