Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 07:25
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$345
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
104% 221 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 777
84% 651 Pts
64-Core 782
52% 782 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$722
MSI(1462 3607) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 498
Reflection 455
Parallax 484
128% 479 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 587
Splatting 306
133% 390 fps
Poor: 95%
This bench: 130%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$200
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 309 338 370 331 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 471
Mixed 388
SusWrite 335
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 44.2
164% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
257% 343 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
42GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 95 94 95 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 81.2
Mixed 50
SusWrite 92.8
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
15GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 41
Write 41.7
Mixed 35
SusWrite 41.3
54% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
46GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 41
Write 42.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 42.3
51% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
5GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 26 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 27
Write 37
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 30.7
42% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
9GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 53 54 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 72.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 43
SusWrite 53.2
80% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 20.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 16,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $768

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback