Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 05:02
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$589
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 249
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 913
77% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,543
96% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 194
Parallax 184
138% 182 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 171
Splatting 126
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$390
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 406 416 409 414 422 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 454
Mixed 428
SusWrite 411
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 40.8
149% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 292
237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 106%
Great: 131%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140
2GB free
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 148
Mixed 181
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 19.6
74% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 79.6
68% 102 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 5.5TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 193 189 149 149 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.9% Good
Read 398
Write 251
Mixed 190
SusWrite 179
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 25.6
90% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 49.2
DQ Mixed 55.9
85% 171 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 75%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
3TB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 1033 1071 1038 1065 1116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,249
Write 1,031
Mixed 816
SusWrite 1,070
234% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 48.6
174% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 808
613% 827 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 206%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 54
MC Mixed 47.3
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 131%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback