Red RHEV Hypervisor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive3.79% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemRed RHEV Hypervisor  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration534 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 130
52% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 154
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 95.4
6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 34 31 25 27 30 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.79% Terrible
Read 31.5
Write 8.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 29
6% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
3% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback