Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	3.79% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Red RHEV Hypervisor (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration	534 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge) 54 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 130 52% 88.5 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 154 21% 154 Pts	64-Core 95.4 6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 34 31 25 27 30 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	3.79% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 8.8 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 29 6% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 3% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Red Hat 1x12GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 10.9 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 163%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM