Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 07:22
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 117
47% 79 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 183
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 0995) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 31
20% 26.1 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 24.4
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OBM Virtual Product 111GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.7 0.6 15 18 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
Read 3
Write 7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 42
10% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
OBM Virtual Product 1TB
69GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 2.3 5.6 5.1 5.2 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 16.3
Mixed 36
SusWrite 4.4
18% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 122%
OBM Virtual Product 949GB
405GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 2.2 5.6 4.9 5.4 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 18.8
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 4.3
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.5
249% 1.73 MB/s
OBM Virtual Product 1TB
133GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.5 5.8 5 5 5.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.3% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 4.5
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.6
282% 2.07 MB/s
OBM Virtual Product 240GB
18GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 2.2 5.6 5.1 5.1 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.22% Terrible
Read 17
Write 9.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 4.4
9% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
OBM Virtual Product 256GB
3GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.3 5.3 4.6 4.7 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 13.8
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 4
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
161% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-032.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback