Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 03:34
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 210
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 72.2
47% 67.5 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 58
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 76 77 81 74 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 460
Mixed 316
SusWrite 117
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 57
205% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 311
248% 346 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
835GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 128 125 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 138
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 126
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
FLASH Drive ITE_USB20 4GB
1GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 2.8 0.1 3 4.2 4.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Read 21
Write 5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 3.4
9% 8.68 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback