Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 04 '16 at 17:42
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 156
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 482
48% 391 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
78GB free
Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 75.2
Write 71.7
Mixed 69.4
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.36
96% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 65%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
55GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 127
Mixed 99.3
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.24
82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 87%
Sandisk Ultra 31GB
29GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 44.4
Write 35.5
Mixed 39.4
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.42
427% 3.11 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 70%
Sandisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 64GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
Read 125
Write 24.2
Mixed 31.8
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.45
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.92
324% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback