Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X150M-PRO ECC-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X150M-PRO ECC-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151204
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 07 '16 at 11:21
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User MNE-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 243
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 655
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.5
18% 20.2 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 17.4
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 999GB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 160
Mixed 145
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.39
109% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 93%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X150M-PRO ECC-CF Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X150M-PRO ECC-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback