Supermicro SYS-7048A-T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-7048A-T  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory120.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 16:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 777
76% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,771
110% 1,771 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000
Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 28
Parallax 19.7
15% 22 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 23.3
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago SMC3108 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1022 1100 1174 1164 1159 1165 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Avago SMC3108 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 4.65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 65 61 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Intel Raid 10 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 371 380 373 381 379 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 382
Write 224
Mixed 74
SusWrite 371
190% 263 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.2
254% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 216%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965600-023.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 35.2
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SYS-7048A-T Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro SYS-7048A-T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback