To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190324
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 22:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 187
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 698
62% 528 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.4% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 56.7
45% 57.2 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 56.3
52% 64 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0607A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 138 589 4.5 488 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,386
Write 1275
Mixed 978
SusWrite 278
218% 979 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 29.2
142% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 15.2
136% 326 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 136%
Great: 264%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
476GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 78
Write 63
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 64.2
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback