Asrock Z75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '19 at 19:54
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 536
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.25
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 38.9
33% 37.4 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 37.5
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 361
Mixed 396
91% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 38.3
129% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 354
270% 365 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
94GB free
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 421 405 415 422 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 428
Mixed 252
SusWrite 420
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 37.1
116% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 94.2
143% 271 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 119%
RAID 640GB
27GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 86 86 86 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 71.3
Write 75.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 86.9
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
114GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 49 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 85.8
Mixed 73
SusWrite 49.5
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 59%
Stacja dysków 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 115 117 117 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.9% Good
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 116
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GR1333D364L9/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z75 Pro3 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback