Sony SVE1712Z1EB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVE1712Z1EB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120823
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 14:15
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 99.2
52% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 248
27% 215 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
Sony(104D 90AC) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 3.91
3% 3.99 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 4.61
4% 4.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 293 294 303 304 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 468
Write 288
Mixed 276
SusWrite 299
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 29.9
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 234
199% 291 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 128%
hp v211w 8GB
1GB free, PID 7840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.8 5.9 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 5
8% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVE1712Z1EB Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVE1712Z1EB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback