Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 157 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 344 38% 299 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0493) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.16% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 1.59 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.39 3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.16% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300 9,430 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.7b Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 356 Write 250 Mixed 238 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 29.3 112% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 155 136% 203 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 89%
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB 12,292 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 454GB free Firmware: 401100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 424 418 427 426 427 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 429 Mixed 358 SusWrite 423 93% 412 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 39.8 136% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 256 219% 323 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 116%
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 84GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.8% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 27.2 Mixed 29 SusWrite 29.9 22% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 6.2 1,095% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 14.4 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,635x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	358x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	158x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62