Asus M51BC

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus M51BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51BC
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 20:50
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 53.9 2-Core 104 51% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 225 26% 204 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 53.1 35% 45.5 fps	MRender 55.9 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 38 39% 48.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 754GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 318 348 335 345 348 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 460 Write 298 Mixed 324 SusWrite 329 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 35.8 120% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 7.2 72% 170 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 155GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 139 142 131 146 134 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 156 Write 150 Mixed 48.2 SusWrite 135 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 156 154 143 145 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 172 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 146 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 112%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 35,039 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 776GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 124 120 115 122 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 94.3 Write 69.4 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 117 60% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 599GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 99 96 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 189 Write 104 Mixed 70 SusWrite 96.6 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 78%
Seagate FreeAgent Pro 750GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 494GB free, PID 3010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 38 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 36.3 46% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 18%
SMI USB DISK 4GB 1,509 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 4.5 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 5.1 8% 7.63 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 8%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 987GB free, PID ab24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 19 18 18 20 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 43.1 Write 50.3 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 20.7 47% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.6% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	98x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	16x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	13x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 12GBAdataBench 41%, 68 samples	8x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363