bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.3 GB free of 9 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime255.4 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 13:32
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.5% Above average
Memory 43.7
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 62.8
29% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 401
56% 413 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 145GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 45 49 48 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 41
SusWrite 48.8
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.1
425% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 61%
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 46 41 49 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 53.3
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 47.9
37% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.5
462% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 33.2
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback