Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PA-D8 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory	121.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '19 at 15:32
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 55 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 146 49% 89.5 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 576 52% 435 Pts	64-Core 1,702 105% 1,702 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F07) ≥ 4GB; RTX 2070 Super CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	106% Outstanding	Lighting 130 Reflection 127 Parallax 131 106% 129 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 132 Splatting 105 110% 139 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 377GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 221 217 217 219 218 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.7% Good	Read 240 Write 220 Mixed 223 SusWrite 218 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 38.9 125% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 168 125% 167 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 644GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 221 217 216 219 218 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71.6% Very good	Read 220 Write 213 Mixed 220 SusWrite 218 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 38.8 132% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 193 145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 133%
USB 3.0 275GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 246GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 110 107 115 109 104 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.3% Below average	Read 273 Write 245 Mixed 250 SusWrite 112 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 17.4 57% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 89.2 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 55.7 43% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 65%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 313GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 115 121 117 118 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 94.5 Write 94.5 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 118 62% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 104%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 38GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 98 93 95 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 94 Write 95 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 95.2 69% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 83%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 6TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 64 66 69 70 70 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 136 Write 148 Mixed 107 SusWrite 68.9 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 409% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 168GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 85 84 74 80 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 57 Write 75.8 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 77.8 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.5 187% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-CF M393B2K70CM0-CF M393B2K70BM1-CF M393B2K70CM0-CF M393B2K70BM1-CF M393B2K70CM0-CF M393B2K70CM0-CF M393B2K70CM0-CF 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.9% Good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 23.4 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.5 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	18x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
P3-256 256GBBench 69%, 2,367 samples	3x

RAM
M393B1G70BH0-CK 4x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 8 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH 4x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 15 samples	3x
M393B2G70DB0-YK 2x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16