Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 04:03
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 118
55% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 282
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 17.2
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.2
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 88 105 62 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 174
Write 106
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 85.9
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 08G-D3-1600-M 08G-D3-1600-M 16GB
667, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback