Asrock D1800M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock D1800M  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141104
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 09:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 48.9
33% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 48.6
8-Core 49
6% 48.8 Pts
64-Core 45.7
3% 45.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.94
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 80 83 72 99 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 226
Write 64
Mixed 92
SusWrite 90.5
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 18.4
77% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 70.2
DQ Mixed 51.1
53% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 71%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
820GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 58.6
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 61.7
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-034.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D1800M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock D1800M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback