Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190624
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '19 at 15:50
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 77.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 225 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 743 73% 595 Pts	64-Core 1231 76% 1231 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% XFX(1682 9395) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 62.7 Parallax 82.7 61% 73.3 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 61.4 Splatting 78.8 56% 67.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 63 57 56 57 57 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 459 Mixed 381 SusWrite 90 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 52.8 182% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 230 209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 42GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 72 75 74 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 78.3 Write 77.5 Mixed 85 SusWrite 73.4 59% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 85%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 593GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 107 107 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 112 Write 108 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 106 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 65%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 619GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 129 130 129 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 135 Write 134 Mixed 92 SusWrite 129 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 85%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 279GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 119 120 118 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 119 Write 117 Mixed 77 SusWrite 118 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.3 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 68%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 165 169 169 167 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 161 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 167 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 100%
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB 2,425 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 149GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 1.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 57.5 11% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	MC Read 37 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 30.3 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 34.1 SC Mixed 26.3 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)