Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DG43RK
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100510
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateOct 18 '16 at 02:55
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 55
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 80.9
37% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 146
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
PwrHis(1787 2313) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.88% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 9.84
9% 10.3 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 8.53
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.36 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.88%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZM100-47 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 47.9
Write 53.4
Mixed 53.5
39% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.29
72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Hitachi HDT722516DLA380 165GB-$32
95GB free
Firmware: V43OA9BA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 39.7
Mixed 20
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.31
85% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 35%
SiImage 2TB
16GB free
Firmware: 0000
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 97.6
Write 160
Mixed 63.1
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.47
156% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-2GBNQ F3-10666CL9-2GBNQ PSD32G13332 Kingston 99P5471-014.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback