Red RHEV Hypervisor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRed RHEV Hypervisor  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070101
Uptime26.9 Days
Run DateOct 18 '16 at 08:22
Run Duration66 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 41.1
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 87.2
34% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 93.8
8-Core 82.5
12% 88.2 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x3GB
1 of 1 slots used
3GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.6
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback