PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A38 |
Motherboard | MSI B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38) (all builds) |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170727 |
Uptime | 18 Days |
Run Date | Aug 03 '19 at 21:15 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 317 392 334 328 324 MB/s
|
66.6%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
68GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
|
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 255x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 92x |
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 81x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 141x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 135x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $444 |