Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 05:56
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 573
60% 479 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 480GB-$300
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 261 224 221 238 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 335
Write 261
Mixed 289
SusWrite 242
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 11.8
40% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 97.9
DQ Mixed 137
107% 151 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 66%
Intel S3500 Series 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: D2010370
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 140 141 137 138 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.9% Above average
Read 278
Write 141
Mixed 163
SusWrite 139
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 19.3
81% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 191
149% 209 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
466GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 404 398 408 404 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 383
Mixed 346
SusWrite 405
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 44.8
152% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 22.3
Mixed 22
SusWrite 10.3
16% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 73%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 32
Write 21.7
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 10.3
16% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.8
299% 2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 96%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 19.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 10.3
15% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 87%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 20.9
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 10.3
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.6% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback