bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1904 x 953 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 23:07
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 207
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 198
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 11D0) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 386.9
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 19.4
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 16.1
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 275GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 55 46 42 56 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 169
Write 134
Mixed 121
SusWrite 50.3
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 5.7
1,003% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 27.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback