Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 17:19
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 124
70% 110 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 122
17% 123 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 53.4
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 43.7
44% 54.1 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 55.5
44% 53.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 34GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,939
Write 164
Mixed 424
618% 842 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 39.9
5,424% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 84.5
722% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.3% Above average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback