ECT One Gamestar PC Xtreme

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	ECT One Gamestar PC Xtreme (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171018
Uptime	16.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '19 at 19:37
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 92.7 1-Core 135 2-Core 263 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 834 80% 659 Pts	64-Core 1,124 70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 141 Parallax 121 107% 131 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 126 Splatting 97.6 89% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 131 130 130 122 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 413 Write 406 Mixed 260 SusWrite 138 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 31.3 97% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 257 214% 310 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 117%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 84GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 76 76 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 95.5 Write 91.7 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 76.3 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.M16FBD 2x8GB 608 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 25.5 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 25.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical One Gamestar PC Xtreme Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

System: ECT One Gamestar PC Xtreme

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	5x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	3x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD 4x16GBCrucialBench 82%, 73 samples	1x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	1x
9905678-105.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 517 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $653

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16