HP EliteOne 800 G1 Touch AiO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteOne 800 G1 Touch AiO  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E6
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '16 at 17:24
Run Duration420 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 381
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
144GB free
Firmware: GG2OA6C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA4C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 100
Mixed 4.98
46% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.17
52% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
252GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 3.77
Mixed 7.28
12% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.07
4K Mixed 0.05
5% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG 99U5428-079.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteOne 800 G1 Touch AiO Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteOne 800 G1 Touch AiO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback