ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba Qosmio G30

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Qosmio G30 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '19 at 16:46
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T2500 407 User benchmarks, average bench 32% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 19.5 2-Core 36.1 31% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 36.1 8-Core 37.9 5% 37 Pts	64-Core 38.7 2% 38.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7600 397 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 0001) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7967 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.03 1% 0.64 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba RAID LD1 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 16 12 22 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.5% Poor	Read 49.3 Write 9.3 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 25.5 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 35%
Toshiba RAID LD0 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 148GB free Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 59 65 91 76 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	Read 95 Write 91.5 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 77.9 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback