bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 17:08
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 79.8
32% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 248
30% 230 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5.1 4.5 5.2 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 60.6
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 5
26% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.2
257% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 219
Write 21.3
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 16.3
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.7
477% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 115%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 1
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 1.6
2% 0.98 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 31.5
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback