HP 241 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 241 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8072
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 05 '16 at 07:52
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4 PRO-3340B HD Graphics
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 68.3
34% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 124
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
HP(103C 8072) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 1.91
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.39
2% 1.94 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS 545025A7E680 250GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GREO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 88.2
Mixed 87.6
68% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Not Available Available 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 241 G1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP 241 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback