User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 81EE
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 21:38
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
34.3% Below average
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 143
52% 110 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 201
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 197
13% 197 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 81EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 15.1
2% 9.97 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 20.4
4% 14.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 57 59 60 65 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 44.3
Write 62.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 62.8
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 1.5
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback