Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 18:06
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 94.9
59% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 302
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2201 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 122
Parallax 115
90% 116 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 105
Splatting 111
89% 108 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 220
Write 220
Mixed 200
SusWrite 80.6
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 31.7
102% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 45.6
38% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 124%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
46GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 203 136 176 177 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 227
Write 220
Mixed 190
SusWrite 174
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 28
94% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 36.2
32% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST9320421AS 320GB-$90
298GB free
Firmware: HP14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 85.5
Write 81.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 82
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3.8
6% 5.25 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback