Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory121 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '16 at 18:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$589
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 1,009
90% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,684
104% 1,684 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7570
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 150
Parallax 135
106% 138 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 136
Splatting 111
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,014
Write 952
Mixed 1,000
221% 989 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 31.4
135% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 167
185% 304 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 156%
Great: 672%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 499
Mixed 444
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 38.6
141% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 124
125% 200 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$235
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-065.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 44.1
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 21.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback