Today's hottest deals

Seneca PRO624686

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSeneca PRO624686  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 14:07
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 183
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 400
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 5.38
4% 6.38 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 5.03
Splatting 0.09
3% 4.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 215GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 168 171 168 166 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 480
Write 386
Mixed 382
SusWrite 170
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 46.7
161% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 172
133% 184 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
10GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 439
Mixed 365
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64.3
216% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 326
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-057.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.7
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback