bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '16 at 18:51
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
Memory 32
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 67.3
26% 44.2 Pts
4-Core 66.1
8-Core 69.3
9% 67.7 Pts
64-Core 61.5
4% 61.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtuel Microsoft-disk 12.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75% Very good
Read 152
Write 108
Mixed 139
101% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.91
4K Write 3.69
4K Mixed 0.36
188% 1.99 MB/s
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Vmware Virtual disk 172GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 62.3
Mixed 52.7
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.09
40% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 0.9
3% 1.1 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 10%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback