Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 80QQ

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	13.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80QQ (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Nano 5B6
Memory	4.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '16 at 15:42
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 65 2-Core 125 57% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 172 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 382A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 5.94 4% 5.83 fps	MRender 7.71 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 10.9 6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H-SSHD-8GB 500GB 407 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: HDFC1E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2207 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 16 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 15 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 84 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 158914904098 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 2 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 271 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	13.8% Very poor	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 99 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 0.25 11% 6.36 MB/s	DQ Read 0.55 DQ Write 18.8 DQ Mixed 0.26 3% 6.55 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 29%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,921 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 9GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 6.69 Mixed 6.02 11% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.01 13% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 14.5 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80QQ Builds (Compare 1,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80QQ

CPU
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	578x
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	355x
Core i5-4288UIntelBench 56%, 1,909 samples	187x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	834x
Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 4,565 samples	143x
GeForce 920MNvidiaBench 5%, 11,731 samples	103x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x
BX500 240GBCrucial $24Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	24x

RAM
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	220x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	179x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	153x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350