Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8464
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 17:37
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-9700E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 120
52% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 181
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8464) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.10.02
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 6.46
Parallax 8.53
4% 6.66 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 5.83
5% 5.95 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 742
Write 556
Mixed 322
119% 540 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 25.4
78% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 193
143% 192 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 164%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
887GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.9
Write 27.1
Mixed 23.4
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA) Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback