HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81F9
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160317
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 23:04
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Memory 37.5
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 39
22% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 54.8
8-Core 45
7% 49.9 Pts
64-Core 64.8
4% 64.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81F9) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.101.1311.1001
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 4.12
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.74 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA7G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 68 54 76 85 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 21.9
Write 91.9
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 70.9
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
29GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 6.1 4.6 4.1 3.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Read 29
Write 8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
11% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.3
129% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB M471A5644EB0-CPB 6GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 9
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback