ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20BF002VLM

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 20BF002VLM (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20BF002VLM
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180530
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264 13,678 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 161 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 235 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 7.31 Parallax 6.06 3% 5.82 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 8.48 5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 408 397 271 263 281 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 455 Mixed 434 SusWrite 331 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 41.5 136% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 129%
WD FILEIO 192GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 161GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.2% Very poor	Read 21.8 Write 11.8 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 19.4 14% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.7 306% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback