Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 07:42
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 365
52% 384 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 19.8
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 19.8
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 550GB
496GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 16 20 19 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Read 15
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 18.2
9% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
61% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 25%
Ccboot iSCSI 8TB
764GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 11 13 12 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 23.9
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 13.3
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback