Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z270P-D3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 16:16
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$229
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 124
57% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 280
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Lighting 85
Reflection 90
Parallax 80
69% 85 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 86.8
Splatting 93.3
74% 89.8 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 254 305 306 291 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 321
Mixed 295
SusWrite 293
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 38.1
138% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 268
225% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 129%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$85
907GB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 192 192 194 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 230
Mixed 113
SusWrite 194
134% 183 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
412% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 24.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback