HP ENVY Sleekbook 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY Sleekbook 6  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 195E
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 22:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3517U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 134
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 184
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 195E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 2.84
3% 3.95 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 7.35
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD240GM7SS 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW190803
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 386 383 401 401 399 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
Read 356
Write 381
Mixed 322
SusWrite 386
82% 361 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 12.3
66% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 21.7
81% 177 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Samsung MZMPC032HBCD-000 9GB
8GB free
Firmware: CXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 85 84 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 336
Write 86.7
Mixed 135
SusWrite 82.7
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 15.9
62% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 61.2
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 34.8
29% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY Sleekbook 6 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY Sleekbook 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback