Today's hottest deals

Asrock AM1B-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AM1B-M  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 09:44
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3850 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 39.3
26% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 80.3
8-Core 80.5
11% 80.4 Pts
64-Core 78.8
5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 853B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 240GB SSD
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 298 349 368 361 356 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 336
Write 361
Mixed 334
SusWrite 343
78% 343 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 174
131% 175 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 92%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
21GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 0.1 0.1 5.1 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 0.3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.7
7% 6.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5584-020.A00LF DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1B-M Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1B-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $22
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback