MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 11:08
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 195
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 755
68% 572 Pts
64-Core 1,353
84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 92
Parallax 174
80% 121 fps
Gravity 121
Splatting 130
112% 126 fps
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 711 595 595 601 608 604 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 2,357
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 619
393% 1,763 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 82.4
276% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 807
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 804
594% 781 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 260%
Great: 340%
Toshiba MG04ACA200EY 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: FQ1B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 169 170 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 182
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 169
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
787GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 120 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 119
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 68%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
317GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 10.3
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 34.7
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 18%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 14
Write 4.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.8
8% 6.97 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C18D4/8G F4-3200C16-8GTZR KHX3200C18D4/8G F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback