Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E4E-K04CL
Memory	1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '19 at 21:14
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 35.9 2-Core 70.8 40% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 174 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C708) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.66 2% 2.24 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.48 3% 3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 62 67 82 69 73 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	40% Average	Read 73.8 Write 87.5 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 65.7 46% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 58%
hp v150w 16GB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 2d40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.4 5.4 4.8 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Read 15 Write 3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.2 8% 6.88 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Kingston ACR128X64D3S1333C9 3GB 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 11.6 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	78x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	190x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	41x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	23x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370