Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock FM2A58M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A58M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140801
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 22:59
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6320 APU 580 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Memory 37.1 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 27.7 23% 33.1 Pts	4-Core 51.4 8-Core 72.1 8% 61.8 Pts	64-Core 58.8 4% 58.8 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 4.56 4% 4.41 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 3.67 Splatting 5.78 4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 119 91 88 91 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 116 Write 139 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 101 68% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 107%
USB3.0 1TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 352GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 34 Write 33.7 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 17.9 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 102%
USB3.0 1TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 694GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 32 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 17.9 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 8GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 7.3 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 6.7 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A58M-HD+ Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-HD+

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	2x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	2x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,606 samples	1x

RAM
99U5584-009.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 829 samples	2x
KHX1600C10D3/4G 99U5402-071.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350