Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-9700K-$360 108,464 User benchmarks, average bench 99% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	77.1% Very good	1-Core 112 2-Core 221 78% 166 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 778 76% 606 Pts	64-Core 816 55% 816 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 109%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540 554,017 User benchmarks, average bench 103% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 281 Reflection 323 Parallax 331 74% 311 fps	MRender 228 Gravity 408 Splatting 256 108% 297 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB 639 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L1QEXH7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 612 400 401 399 401 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 658 Write 592 Mixed 598 SusWrite 465 130% 578 MB/s	4K Read 56 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 43.3 188% 63.4 MB/s	DQ Read 700 DQ Write 684 DQ Mixed 1,100 714% 828 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 238%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 348,320 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 926GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 197 199 199 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 186 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 198 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 116%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 504 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 42GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 26 25 28 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 17.7 Write 27 Mixed 9 SusWrite 25.7 28% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.8 126% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 135%

UFO

Workstation 125%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 270%, 134,973 samples	1,645x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $100Bench 293%, 63,309 samples	1,259x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 307%, 55,620 samples	1,132x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $75Bench 87%, 106,449 samples	1,374x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $58Bench 84%, 285,104 samples	948x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $80Bench 86%, 46,729 samples	931x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,507

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24